Prior to taking on a client, ELAP requires that the prospective plan-document be reviewed by our designated and exclusive specialist law firm. The review of the plan-doc is not all-encompassing. Rather, the purpose of the review is to identify certain crucial language in the plan-doc that ELAP believes could either lead to benefit disputes or worsen a benefit dispute.

According to the recommendations of our attorneys, ELAP may ask the Plan Sponsor to revise or amend its plan document. The goals are two-fold. The first is to strictly comply with Federal Law. The second is to maximize the clarity with which certain passages are written, so as to minimize potential disputes due to ambiguity.

Here are the sections of the plan document that are certain to be reviewed, as well as information regarding other program-related documents:
 
  • We use a Plan Amendment that allocates the duty to make final benefit determinations to ELAP, Inc., and it establishes ELAP, Inc. as a (limited) Fiduciary – Designated Decision Maker (DDM) -- for the Plan. This Amendment provides maximum legal protection to the plan sponsor and to ELAP, and it is the ONLY Amendment that is non-negotiable – we must add this to the Plan-Doc of our prospective client.

Click here to view the DDM Plan Amendment. (Adobe Acrobat Reader Required)
 

TOP
 
  • For the purposes of strict compliance with the DOL Claims Processing Regulations of July 1, 2002, our attorney will review the section of your plan-doc that addresses a participant’s rights to file Claims and Appeals.  The 7/1/2002 DOL Reg is very specific, and failure to comply means a participant can bypass the plan’s appeals process and go straight to Federal court with a lawsuit.  Our attorney will look for or add compliant language.
     
TOP
 
  • So that a plan participant is fully aware of his/her rights as a beneficiary of the Plan, our attorney will look for or add a Statement of ERISA Rights.
     
  • To be sure that the Plan complies with all laws and regulations that might have jurisdiction over the Plan, our attorney will look for or add a Conformity with Applicable Laws provision.
     
  • So as to prevent a participant from having an infinite amount of time to file for legal remedies against the Plan, our attorney will look for or add a Limitation on Actions provision.
     
  • To attempt to minimize the chances of disputes on the FRONT-END, our attorneys will review and may suggest revisions to certain exclusions and/or definitions, such as:
      • Experimental/Investigational
      • Medical Necessity/Medically Necessary
      • Obesity/Obesity-related treatment
         
  • DDM Service Agreement (our contract) 


Click here to view a sample copy of our contract-for-services, which we sign directly with plan sponsors. (Adobe Acrobat Reader Required)

TOP
 
  • Decision-Letters.  These are obviously not a part of the plan-doc, but ELAP prefers to write its decision letters directly to the plan participants, with a copy to the Plan Sponsor (and TPA).  This allows us to assure that the plan participant is fully aware of his or her rights, now that the DOL-mandated appeals-process has concluded.
 
TOP

Home | Program Overview | Examples of Actual ELAP Decisions | Relevant Court Cases | FAQ's | Program Legal Documents | NON-erisa Plans
Stop-Loss Partnership | Links & Program Partners | Other Related Links | Key People | Registered Users | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use