Q: Very simply stated, what is ELAP?
A:
ELAP is an Outsourced Claim Fiduciary.  We make benefit determinations at the final level of appeal, and we accept legal responsibility for each decision we issue.

Q: Why would I be interested in an Outsourced Fiduciary to handle my appeals?
A:
Under ERISA, the self-funded Employer (or a Plan Administrator / Trustee) is responsible for benefit decisions and ultimately responsible for handling any dispute brought by a plan participant. Frequently, employers are in the position of making difficult coverage decisions with serious legal and medical implications.

TOP

Q: What does ERISA demand of a Fiduciary?
A:
Some language frequently used by the Courts to describe the proper fiduciary conduct:  REASONABLE, INDEPENDENT, PRUDENT, UNBIASED, INFORMED, FAIR – and acting with an UNDIVIDED LOYALTY TO BENEFICIARIES.

TOP

Q: What does the Dept. of Labor require of the decision-making process?
A:
The DOL’s latest Claim Regulation requires the following:

  • Time frames in which plans must make decisions are compressed and very strict.
     
  • Hierarchy – person who handled an E-O-B cannot handle the appeal(s), nor can that person’s subordinate.
     
  • Decisions based wholly or in part on a medical judgment require consultation with an appropriate medical professional.
     
  • Failure by employer to comply allows an employee to bypass the appeal process and go directly to court.

TOP

Q: Does ERISA allow for the transfer of Fiduciary Duty?
A:
Yes, but the allocation (or transfer) of the duty must be clearly stipulated in the Plan Document.

TOP

Q: Exactly how does the Transfer of Fiduciary Duty work?
A:
Via the following process:

  • The Plan must establish either 1-appeal or 2-appeals – per DOL Regulations.
     
  • The EOB denial (and the 1st appeal if you have two) are handled by the TPA, per The Plan and DOL.
     
  • If a participant makes a final appeal, the Plan and TPA refer it to ELAP, Inc. These are “Referred Appeals,” which are defined in ELAP’s contract.
     
  • You amend your Plan Document to name ELAP as a co-Fiduciary (or “Designated Decision Maker”), and you sign a contract to accept this service – the “DDM Service Agreement.”
     
  • ELAP issues an independent decision, acting in its appointed Fiduciary capacity.

TOP

Q: What are the advantages to OUTSOURCING the claim fiduciary role?
A:
ELAP decisions are professional and free of conflict of interest. The nature of the appeal determines the type of reviewer:

·         For medical appeals, ELAP uses a nationally recognized and URAC certified Independent Review Organization.  Our IRO panel consists of over 500 specialist physicians.  ELAP will use a panel physician Board Certified in the particular specialty.

·         For legal appeals, ELAP utilizes law firms with expertise in employee benefit law.

·         For billing and payment disputes, ELAP retains experts with extensive backgrounds in health care finance, typically at the hospital level.

·         ELAP’s benefit determinations will be reasonable, professional and unbiased. Our objective is to provide a full and fair review process that complies with ERISA and is defensible in a court of law.

TOP

Q:
What happens if a plan participant is not satisfied with the ELAP decision?
A:  Once the appeal process is exhausted, the recourse for a plan participant is to file suit in federal court: 
 

  • If you have purchased ELAP, we will be the primary defendant, as we are the Fiduciary that made the final decision, and our Duty to do so is spelled out in the Plan Document.
     
  • ELAP pays for our legal defense.
     
  • ELAP also pays the Plan defense costs if you are named in the suit, as long as you allow us to choose the attorney(s). The Plan is an Additional Insured under the ELAP Professional Liability coverage.
     
  • ELAP also pays for resulting damages (as defined in the “DDM Service Agreement”), including any restitutionary damages awarded to the plan participant.  Our limit is $1,000,000 per legal action.
     
  • ELAP does not pay the amount of the benefit if the benefit is awarded to the participant.

TOP

Q:  What is the “Expanded Version” of ELAP?
A:  This includes Medical Bill Review to achieve significant claims savings.

TOP

Q:  How would ELAP’s Medical Bill Review services save money for a Plan?
A:  This Review is conducted before your TPA pays your claim.  It is a line-by-line analysis of each and every charge to detect duplication, miscoding or other abuse or inaccuracies.

TOP

Q:  What “savings” does ELAP consider as “significant”?
A:  Forty Percent.  Our experience indicates that savings of forty percent off billed charges, independent of PPO
discounts, are not unrealistic.

TOP

Q:  How is this possible?
A:  The current system of discounts based on billed charges creates an unrealistic starting point that favors the provider. Through effective plan language and a line-by-line review of provider bills, ELAP utilizes the protections inherent in
ERISA to level the playing field and generate savings of plan assets.

TOP

Q:  How unrealistic can billed charges be?

A:  Consider the example below, actual figures published in the 2004 “Hospital Performance Report” by Pennsylvania
Health Care Cost Containment Council
. All four hospitals are in Chester County, PA:
 

Hospital Name   Angioplasty / Stent
Chester County    $39,921
Paoli Hospital  $87,785
Phoenixville Hospital  $89,192
Brandywine Hospital  $137,402

TOP

Q:  How does ELAP address this?
A:  As follows:

  • Plan adopts ELAP’s recommended language establishing Applicable Plan Limits.
     
  • When a claim over a dollar threshold is filed, TPA sends to ELAP for audit prior to payment.
     
  • TPA pays provider the audited amount with EOB denial of the excess charges.
     
  • Excess charges are those above the Applicable Plan Limit.
     
  •  Provider is notified of its Right to Appeal, as per an assignment of benefits.
     
  • If the Provider sues, ELAP will defend the Plan and ELAP will defend the participant from balance billing.

v      Our objective is to stay within the boundaries and protections of ERISA and away from the arbitrary, and frequently abusive, provider billing practices.

TOP

Q:  What are the implications of not reviewing medical bills?
A:  There are two major implications:

  • Economic – Plans simply cannot continue to pay inflated bills (see Chester County example).
     
  • Legal - ERISA mandates that plan assets be spent in a prudent manner.  Fiduciaries that pay inflated bills are not acting as good stewards of the plan assets and could be breaching their fiduciary obligation under ERISA.

Home | Program Overview | Examples of Actual ELAP Decisions | Relevant Court Cases | FAQ's | Program Legal Documents | NON-erisa Plans
Stop-Loss Partnership | Links & Program Partners | Other Related Links | Key People | Registered Users | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use