Example One:
One (covered) bone marrow transplant enabled a cancer-patient to go into
remission. When the patient relapsed and the multiple myeloma recurred,
the treating physician recommended a second and more controversial bone
marrow transplant.
Was the second procedure experimental and therefore excluded or have
advances in medical technology made this a standard and acceptable (and
covered) course of treatment?
Example Two:
The plan participant sustained multiple, serious head injuries as a result
of a motor vehicle accident. The patient was immediately admitted to
intensive care (ICU) at the closest hospital. The patient remained in ICU
for over a week. The Plan, based upon review by a managed care entity,
denied the ICU-rate for all except the initial two days, saying the
patient should have been moved to a regular hospital room after 48-hours.
Were all of the days in ICU medically necessary?
TOP
Example Three:
Plan specifically excludes all “care and treatment of weight loss.” The
treating physician says that a gastric-bypass procedure is medically
necessary because the patient is morbidly obese.
Can the exclusion be upheld?
TOP
Example Four:
The SPD specifically requires that all claims be submitted for payment
“within 12 months of the date that the eligible expense was incurred.” Even
if the procedure was a covered benefit...
Can this denial for untimely filing be enforced?
TOP
Example Five:
A surgical-clinic split-billed for surgery in phases. Plan paid one
(lesser) global fee.
Which fee is appropriate, according to the
provider contract and currently accepted medical practice?
TOP
|